Showing posts with label paper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paper. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

A Pauline Theology of Pastoral Teaching of Believers



      The role of a Pastor in a local church shouldn't be defined or decided by what’s culturally normal within the local church, by its board members, or by a “church boss”. A pastoral role within the church is one that is clearly outlined for us in scripture. Slightly different from what I originally thought to be true and what may be the general opinion, the pastoral role involves more teaching than preaching. A careful study of the Pastoral Epistles reveals the duties, goals, and content of pastoral teaching, along with the requirements for the man himself.

1.      Why should we teach?

What is the Rationale and Motivations for a Pastoral Teacher? There are many reasons why men choose to be a Pastor. Hopefully, among those are the following… First, God commands it (Eph. 4:11-16; 2 Tim. 2:2). God gave gifts to men to equip them so they could teach in a pastoral–teaching capacity in the local church. Although the “Great Commission” isn’t in Paul’s Epistles it still definitely applies here. It says, “Go and teach all nations” (Matthew 28:20). A command by Jesus to go teach, or educate people about this ‘new life’ that Christ offers. Secondly, we teach because we are to “equip”, “strengthen”, and “encourage” the body of Christ (Romans 12:7). And, finally, although oftentimes a person’s motives can be incorrect, our teaching should flow out of a heart that “loves others” (John 13:35). While our teaching (“works) may be ‘judged’ by man it most assuredly will be judged and reviewed on Judgment day (Col. 1:28) - If that isn’t a good motivation I don’t know what is.

2.      What are the qualifications of a Pastor-Teacher?

They need to be able to discern falsehood from truth (1 Tim. 1:3; 1:7; 6:20; 2 Tim. 2:2; Titus 1:9). Each pastor-teacher should have good judgment, who can tell whether something is false or true and can reason from scripture in a logical and true way and who refutes contrary teaching. Second, those teaching in the church must be men (1 Tim. 2:11). In leadership in the local church, “A woman isn’t to be above a man”. This includes teaching and preaching the scriptures. Thirdly, they must have the abilities of a teacher. They can’t bore people to death. They need to be able to keep some level of interest, in a way that’s edifying and encouraging to the body of Christ (2 Timothy 2:24). Fourthly, they must be mature and not “new converts” (1 Tim. 4:7; 5:17; 2 Tim. 2:15; Acts 20:35). They must be a person of godliness who’s disciplined, who works hard, and who is diligent and teachable. A definite must for a teacher must also be, “without stain” until Christ’s return and who is always “conditioned and ready (1 Tim. 4:16; 6:13-21). And, according to 1 Timothy 4:12 it doesn’t matter his age - that’s of no concern to God - he must seek to be an example in all things. He must be content with the things God gives to him (1 Tim. 6:6-12) and must be a teacher who teaches with wisdom (considers maturity level of the listener and properly adapts to the individuals circumstances or audience) (Col. 1:28). A pastor-teacher must also be appointed by God (1 Cor. 12:28). They are to be good caretakers of the home and wife (1 Tim. 3:1). They must find their confidence in Christ Jesus (1 Tim. 3:1).

3.      What are the intended results or Goals of Pastoral teaching?

Various pastor-teachers have various goals; however, what were Paul’s goals as one of the greatest teachers of all time? His goals included: Shepherding and leading the “flock” so they could “love from a pure heart” and a good conscience and who were sincere and honest in their faith (1 Tim. 1:5; 1 Thess. 4:11). Second, It was to glorify God. Right after Paul finished talking  about the role of teachers, he says “Let God be glorified” (1Tim. 1:17; 1 Cor. 10:31). Third, a goal of good teaching is to point out false teaching, (1 Tim. 4:6) and ultimately to save mankind from hell (1 Tim. 4:16). Another reason is to strengthen believers (Acts 16:4) so they are strong in the faith (Col. 2:7) and who can one day be presented before Christ as “perfect” and “complete” (Col. 1:28; 1 Thess. 4:12). The only way to do this is through “equipping” believers properly (Eph. 4:11). Finally, another end goal and result of our pastoral teaching is so we produce disciples who make disciples. It’s a pastors job is to “entrust the message” to other men who can “entrust it to other” faithful men who also can teach. (1 Tim. 2:2; Matt 28:19-20). 

4.      What Should the Pastor teach and what should be taught first, second, third, etc.?

Paul, when it comes to teaching doctrine and practical application doesn’t miss anything. He was truly a master at covering all the bases and all that needed covering. When he taught it was the “whole counsel of God”. (Acts. 20:20) It included the O.T. and often referred to the O.T. as the “scriptures”, (Rom. 15:4) and when he taught he didn’t do so with impartiality to the text – all that was to be covered by the text was covered whether he thought it would be easy or not. (1 Tim. 5:21) In many of Paul’s Epistles he would begin with doctrinal issues and then branch off into practical application. Noticeable examples of this “shift” occur all throughout the epistles. What he often taught first was the core truths necessary for salvation, and entrance into heaven would often be presented first, then he would teach the best way to apply it. His Doctrinal teaching includes and is not limited to: Teaching about the Second Coming, Resurrection, and the wrath to come (1 Thess. 1:10); Romans itself is mostly doctrinal in nature and includes topics like, justification by faith, sanctification, sin, Spirit-led life, election, relating to civil government, spiritual gifts, teaching that the O.T. was still relevant to today. (1 Thess. 4:2; Acts 15:35) In addition to it was: (Eph 4:21) description helping us “put off the old” and “putting on the new” in Christ Jesus. Paul himself admonishes us to, “teach what (he) Paul or Christ would teach” (1 Tim. 6:3-5) and to not make up some “other gospel”. Practical teaching includes and is not limited to: teaching that results in “discipline for the purpose of godliness”(1 Tim. 4:7), how believers are to deal with widows in the church and beyond. (1 Tim. 5:1), how we are to handle an accusation against an elder or a brother/sister (1 Tim. 5:19-20), how employees are to treat their bosses and fellow employees whether Christian or not (1 Timothy 6:1), and the attitude believers are to have towards this worlds goods (1 Tim. 6:6-8) For those who have a lot of this worlds goods, we are to teach the rich not to put their hope in their riches (1 Tim. 6:17); about, the invariability and inevitability of suffering if we follow Jesus (Acts 14:21-22); That, If anyone refuses to work hard he shouldn’t be allowed to work hard at eating (2 Thess.3:10). In addition to what has been mentioned we are to: Encourage all listening to “share the gospel” with those who will listen (1 Thess. 1:8); people are to be able to discern true from false teaching (Eph. 4:14); ladies are to be taught to be productive and not idle gossips (1 Tim. 5:14); We are to remind believers that the Lord will avenge the defrauded (1 Thess. 4:11); A pastor teacher must also learn Titus 3:14, that if people are to learn they must be taught to “engage in good deeds” in things that are “necessary” and “kingdom building” and “gospel centered” and “God glorifying”. (Titus 3:14). Believers are also to keep steady and stand firm and live pleasing to God. (2 Thess. 2:15; 1 Thess. 4:1); Pastor Teachers are to correct believers in accordance to specific guidelines. (i.e. treat older men with respect, treat the younger as brothers and sisters) (1 Tim. 5:1). They are also to teach or reveal what isn’t to be taught – false doctrine, and are to refute it using sound judgment, wisdom, and scripture (1 Tim. 1:9; 4:1; 6:20; Acts 20:29-31; 1 Thess. 4:6). Not only are they to teach what isn’t to be taught they are also to train others to teach. The words and the lessons that we share is to dwell “so richly” in believers (note: it isn’t exclusive and does not say pastor-teachers) that they “are to be able to teach and admonish” other believers as well and  in addition to pastor-teachers (Col. 3:16). In addition, people are to be taught to measure any teachings they receive against are “the word of Christ” and “teaching that encourages and helps nurture godliness”. And finally, we are to have taught these things consistently (1 Tim. 6:3).

5.      What should a Pastors Method be in Teaching the Word?

Where and the location in which Paul taught is something of interest. Often he would teach in the public (in the synagogues - Acts 19:8-9; 1 Tim. 4:13), in private where fellowship and instruction were had in the same context (house to house - Acts 20:20; cf. 1 Cor. 14:35 Acts 20:7), and to gathered believers in general. (Acts 20)      The way Paul taught was through, personal letters (1 Tim. 3:14; 2 Thess. 3:14), personal messengers (1 Thess. 3; Timothy, Epaphroditus, Phil 2:17; Col. 4), in person, and by life and his testimony (1 Tim. 4:12; 2 Thess. 3:7; 1 Cor. 4:16; Acts 20:35; Phil. 3:17).            Paul taught, much and often. It was weekly (Acts 13), Daily (Acts 19:9), and sometimes night and day (Acts 20:31).                       The sequence that Paul used in Teaching was to: Remind what they’ve learned (2 Tim. 2:11-14; 1 Cor. 4:17), Address current needs, (Gal; 1 Cor.; Philemon), and to address the current maturity level of the audience (i.e. – Compare the audience Ephesus to that of Rome or Thessalonica).
Even though Paul was imprisoned, beaten, shipwrecked and nearly killed for the sake of the gospel he still had a gentle side to his rough hide. We to should seek to be gentle and reasonable even in hard circumstances as well. We are to preach and teach with gentleness (1 Thess. 2:7), kindness (2 Tim. 2:24), with patience (2 Tim. 2:24, through appeals and exhorts (Tit. 1:9), commands (1 Tim. 1:3), reasons and reminders (2 Tim. 2:14), as a father would teach a child (1 Thess. 2:11), in a tender way as a mother would teach/train her children (1 Thess. 2:7), and through admonishing (Co. 1:28) Not only that but we should also teach in such a way that doesn’t dishonor us or the ministry or “God’s kingdom”. (1 Tim. 6:1) We are to avoid flattery (1 Thess. 2:5), human eloquence or wisdom (1 Cor. 2:1, 4), and intentional shaming of our fellow believers (1 Cor. 4:14). Behind the scenes a pastors method should always be to working very hard (1 Tim. 5:17) with diligence (2 Tim. 2:15) so we are worthy of our wage whether by physical manual labor or through working through teaching and preaching the word. (1 Thess. 2:9) Our teaching should be sincere (2 Tim. 1:3), and is to be taught in an “urgent/flaming” way (2 Tim. 1:6), is to believers generally (Acts 13) and male leaders specifically (Acts 20; 1 Tim. 2:2).

6.      What is the Relationship between the Role of the Pastoral vs. the role of a Teacher in Pauline Thought?

In Paul’s epistles he differentiates a Preacher, Apostle, Teacher from others in the church. (2 Tim. 1:11; Acts 13:1) They are three separate callings, and yet have the ability, like Paul had, to all be united as one calling. Each has a different function and role. Teaching is a subset of preaching and apostleship (1 Tim. 2:7); preach the word… with instruction (2 Tim. 4:2). But, preaching more often than naught is not a subset of teaching. Paul exhorts Timothy to devote himself to reading (the Scriptures), preaching, and teaching, not one to the exclusion of the other (1 Tim. 4:13). Prophesying results in learning (1 Cor. 14:6; 31), thus it is a form of teaching. The title of the role is Pastor and Teacher (Eph. 4:11) Teaching figures prominently in the role. In most of the Pastoral Epistles teaching is emphasized. For example: 1 Tim. 4:11 – command and teach these things; 1 Tim. 6:2 – teach and exhort these things; 1 Tim. 5:17 – those who work in the word and teaching.

7.      What is Relationship of the Great Commission to Pastoral Teaching Responsibilities?

The Great commission really is referring to the broad “scope” of teaching believers. In Matthew 28:18-19 Christ says to his disciples, “Go make disciples of all nations”. In Jesus last moments on earth with His disciples He reminded them to go into all the world teaching them  all  things and that all Christ taught them. Pastoral teaching is universal –it’s to and for all. Pastoral teaching should include anything that would be within the will of God. The full scope of our teaching is that it can leave an eternal impact. Our teaching should be that of encouraging, equipping, and admonishing believers and unbelievers alike to someday be able to, “face Christ without shame or sorrow”.
8.      How has preparing this Essay Helped Me as a Future Pastor/Teacher?
First, it’s helped me to see the big picture. Preaching isn’t about miming a few words, or being a “mouthpiece” for God – although that’s one of the purposes, it’s so much more than that. It’s a calling. It’s something God still calls people to do that involves, teaching, witnessing, preaching, loving, caring, encouraging, and nurturing the body. Teaching the word isn’t and should never be stale and stagnant – it should be “alive and breathing” so to encourage change in the believer so they are “prepared for every good work” and can be presented before the Father “blameless”. Second and finally, It’s given me more of an awe for the ministry. I now respect the ministry more than I did before. Now only do I respect the office of pastor teacher it but I even have a little holy fear somewhat. God’s requirements for the teacher in the church is nothing but high.



Friday, May 3, 2013

Witnessing to Mormons


Have you ever had a Mormon question you about your faith? I know I have! Sometimes it can be rough knowing what to say, but it doesn't have to be that way. Here's a recent paper I submitted that describes, and refutes the Mormon cultist faith. Hopefully this is of help... 
Brief History of Mormonism
            The religion of Mormonism supposedly began many centuries ago when two great nations migrated to the Americas one of which was wicked and the other religious. According to their doctrine, Jesus Christ came over later after his resurrection to preach the gospel to these people. Four hundred years after Christ, a prophet Nephtite wrote down their history on gold plates and buried them, which Joseph Smith later discovered and translated with a seer stone. During this time he never showed them publicly. After they were translated they were transported to heaven by angels. Mormons claim that archaeology has proven the book of Mormon to be true. Yet, none of the 3,200 cities named in the book of Mormon. The Mormons, also known as the Latter Day Saints, claim that they are the restoration of true Christianity. They also believe in the divine prophetic word of prophets (such as LDS Presidents, etc) and a “burning in the bosom” feeling or experience.
Disproving the Mormon Doctrine of Salvation.
            Mormons believe that they are saved through faith and obedience to ordinances of the Mormon Church, and that one cannot have assurance of salvation. The belief is that according to Ephesians 2:8-9, we have been saved by grace not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. For a college class I was asked to interview two Mormons. In that interview I noticed they believed that the assurance rested in their “burning in the bosom” and not on scripture. My argument was that a burning in the bosom, or as we call it, a feeling is a possible outflow of that assurance but is not the means to an end. One argument I used in that interview was a presentation of 1 John 5:13, that says, if a person believes in Jesus Christ they can know that they had eternal life without a doubt. I also made the case that you cannot just pull a Scripture, such as this one, out of context and forget about the rest of the Bible – I reminded them that if you want to get to heaven, you must first repent, and then walk in all the light God has given us living according to commandments and such. Most Mormons do not know that they have salvation until judgment.
Disproving the Mormon Doctrine of God.
            Mormons believe that “God himself was once as we are now and is an exalted man”. The foundational belief for this is a belief that God has a physical body. However, John 4:24, Luke 24:37-39, and Matthew 16:15-17 refute this by saying that God is a Spirit. They used to believe that Adam created both God and man, but they obviously have changed in doctrine since then which in turn proves their inconsistency. Along with their doctrine of God, they believe that human beings will exist eternally after physical death in one of the three places –heaven on earth, the heaven of the “heavens”, and hell. Part of this belief is that God evolved from mortal man. Lorenzo Snow, a Mormon leader, when speaking of John 3:16, stated, “As man now is, God once was. As God is now, man may become.” The Scripture verses I would use to refute this are the following: Psalm 90:2 – which says that God is everlasting and forever; Mal 3:6 – says that God doesn't change; Numbers 23:19 – says that God is not a man; In fact, even the book of Mormon in Mormon 9:10 refutes this idea.
            Not only do the Mormons believe that God evolved from man, and that as mortal man we can become like God, but they also believe in polytheism. Joseph Smith said, “In the beginning, the head of the gods called a council of the gods; and they came together and concocted a plan to create the world and the people in it.” (King Follet Discourse)[1] Scripture refutes this. Isaiah 44:6 says that the LORD is the first and the last and that there is no other God but him. Then in 44:8 He repeats Himself and says: “Is there anyone beside me? Surely no!” In Isaiah 45:18 and 22 He says yet again “I am the LORD who created the heaven and earth and there is none beside me”. Lastly, Isaiah 43:10 which contradicts the belief in polytheism, says, ”I am the only God, before me there was no other and after me there will be no other.” Therefore, it is clear that their key statement that they often use to support their belief in polytheism can be easily disproven with these scriptures.
Other Ways to Disprove Mormonism
            One argument that can be used in disproving Mormonism, is to disprove the extermination of the Nephites. The footnotes in the Book of Mormon suggest that the extermination of the Nephites happened between A.D. 400 and 421. Yet it left no archeological evidence. In contrast, there was a much smaller battle that took place centuries earlier in 1st century A.D. in Palestine that shows what we would expect to find if this battle from the book of Mormon had really occurred. Josephus, a historian, describes a rock in the desert named Masada, where 900 people were besieged by the Romans, all of whom eventually died. Archaeologists identified and excavated it in the 1960’s. What they found was very clear evidence such as coins and houses, proving that these events actually took place there. No civilization can be wiped out in such a way that (even some of) a remnant is no longer left. In Ether 15 in the Book of Mormon, a huge war is described during which millions are massacred. Where is the evidence of this catastrophe? We know that the Hill, Komora was where the last major events in the book of Mormon took place. In Mormon 8:2 we read, “And now it came to pass that after the great and tremendous battle at Cumorah, behold, the Nephites who had escaped into the country southward were hunted by the Lamanites, until they were all destroyed. It goes on and makes an account of about how many died. William Wilson an LDS Anthropologist from Northern Arizona University, stated that, “Each time a new massacre would happen, the book of Mormon records that tens of thousands died. When you add them all up it’s over 250,000 that were left dead”[2]. Yet, when Wilson did excavations in Palmyra, NY he found nothing. If even 50,000 died, archaeologists assumed that they would have found remains of bones in mass burial sites, metal from spears, chariots, etc. In Jerusalem anytime another object is found they begin excavating that site to find more evidence. So why does the Mormon Church not do this in the hill Cumorah in Palmyra, NY.
            There was a man named Thomas Ferguson who endeavored to prove that the book of Mormon was true by going to South America and finding archaeological evidence proving its validity. At that time he was a devout Mormon. “He worked at the anthropology department at Brigham Young University.”[3] “After spending millions of dollars in excavations and research he couldn’t find anything.”[4] He went in a hopeful Mormon, but eventually left the faith and is now excommunicated from the church.
My Humble Conclusion
            Joseph Smith said, “I told the brethren that the book of Mormon was the most correct of any on earth, and the keystone of our religion and that man would get nearer to God by abiding in its precepts than by any other book.”[5] My conclusion is, if the book of Mormon is the most correct book on earth, then we have many other books full of lies. If the people that it talks about did not exist historically, and there is no other evidence of any of the events, then, as the evidence proves, there was no visit of Jesus Christ to the Americas. Therefore, “it then couldn’t be another testament of Jesus Christ”.[6]
            Gordon B. Hickley the late LDS Prophet and President said,
            “As a church we have critics many of them. They say we do not believe in the traditional            Christ of Christianity. There is some substance to what they say. Our faith, our     knowledge, is not based on ancient tradition… Our faith, our knowledge comes of the         witness of a prophet in this dispensation…” (April 2002 General Conference)[7]
            This man is basically saying that he does not believe in the Christian Christ, but in the Christ that Joseph Smith taught. I would recommend that you at least quote this to your Mormon friend, and if he or she gets mad then you say, “This is what your prophet said”. How can they argue against their own prophet? Furthermore, William Wilson a former LDS member and follower, who is now an anthropologist at the Northern Arizona University stated (after reviewing much evidence), “Mormons do not believe in the same Christ”.[8]  Also, Galatians 1:9-12 says,
            As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than           that ye have received, let him be accursed. Or do I now persuade men, or God? For do I     seek to please men? For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. But I             certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I       neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.”
             I thank God that we have the TRUE story, the one that isn’t flawed. We believe in something that brings and will bring true hope. We need to open our doors to Mormons when they come knocking and expose this cult for what it truly is. This book has been disproven by secular and religious scholars alike. From the historical, archaeological  factual, and biblical evidence, I and many other scholars would agree that the Book of Mormon is only 19th Century Religious fiction. Wouldn’t you agree?
Suggestions when Witnessing to a Mormon
            In closing I would like to give some brief pointers in sharing one’s faith with Mormons, along with the arguments and scriptures that have already shared. When you plan to meet, find a quiet place such as the corner of a coffee shop to meet – it is more conducive to deeper thinking. Also, understand that they will be meeting with you in a suit and tie so dressing in a dressy or casual manner would be appropriate - I wouldn’t recommend jeans and a tee shirt. The last time I offered some Mormons a drink, forgetting that there are some drinks they would not drink, such as those that contain caffeine – so you could instead offer water. Also, when you interact, always remember that you may be arguing for your faith (or theirs), you may be disagreeing with them, you may even get a little red in the face at some of the outlandish things they say – but never forget to love them like Christ! They are people just like you who are in search of truth, whether they outwardly say or show that or not.
            Furthermore, according to Maxwell, it’s a good thing to, “avoid telling Mormons what they believe”. Instead, ask them what their position is on a certain issue. Second, always define your terms. Maxwell said you need to understand that, “Mormonism has accepted Christian terminology while substituting its truth for private definitions”.[9] This is huge! So make sure you know what you’re agreeing to before you agree that both Christianity and Mormonism agree (or differ) theologically on a subject. Know their terms and your own. Finally, use some of the information provided in this essay to refute or bring into question their beliefs.
            In closing, I wish the best to you in your endeavors with Mormons! Keep trying, the truth always prevails in the end.



Works Cited
Discourses, the power of the Holy Ghost."  Journal of, and vol. 3 p. 3 (1856). "False Prophecies/Quotes." Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Apr. 2013. .
Faith, their "Articles of, " their "Creeds,  ", and  their. "Orson Pratt, "Authenticity of the Book of Mormon"." BOAP: The Book of Abraham Project. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Apr. 2013. .
"Joseph Smith's King Follet Sermon." Utah Lighthouse Ministry. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Apr. 2013.
Stanley, Charles. "NO Historical Evidence to Support the Book of Mormon." Introduction to Jesus Christ. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Apr. 2013. .
"The Book of Mormon vs The Bible, Part 3 of an indepth study of Latter Day Saints Archeology - YouTube." YouTube. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Apr. 2013. .
Volume, and Issue ». "Questions to Ask Your Mormon Friend: Effective Ways to Challenge a Mormon's Arguments without Being Offensive - LeIsle Jacobson - FARMS Review - Volume 7 - Issue 1." Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship - Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Apr. 2013. .


            MLA formatting by BibMe.org.



[1]  Joseph Smith, n.d. (utlm.org)
[2] The Book of Mormon vs. the Bible, n.d. (youtube.com)
[3] C. Stanley, n.d. (evangelical.us)
[4] The Book of Mormon vs. the Bible, n.d. (youtube.com)
[5] Discourses, 1856 (inplainsite.org)
[6] The Book of Mormon vs. the Bible, n.d. (youtube.com)
[7] Discourses, 1856 (inplainsite.org)
[8] The Book of Mormon vs. the Bible, n.d. (youtube.com)
[9] LeIsle Jacobson, n.d. (Maxwellinstitute.byu.edu)